Full source in your repository
Not a license. Not an escrow arrangement. Your repo, your code, from the first commit.
The GENIUS Act established a federal framework for payment stablecoins in 2025. Full implementation lands in 2027, and the window for community institutions is open now.
You don't commit to a money-supply system on day one. A three-week Feasibility Sprint gives your board a costed answer: the right instrument, a target architecture, and a core-integration assessment. Every dollar of it credits toward the build if you proceed.
All prices here are estimates for planning, indicative and subject to a scoped Statement of Work. The Feasibility Sprint replaces every range on this page with a fixed number for your institution.
Each stage is a fixed fee with a defined deliverable and a real exit. If you stop after the Sprint, you keep a signed-off requirements document your board can act on. If you stop after the Pilot, you keep a working system and a test suite. Nothing here is a subscription you can't leave.
Discovery with your executive sponsor, compliance lead, and IT lead. A stablecoin-vs-tokenized-deposit recommendation, target architecture, core-integration assessment, and a costed roadmap.
Credited in full against the Pilot Build if you proceed within 90 days.
A working system on a private permissioned chain: token contract, role separation, on-chain compliance and allowlisting, reserve reconciliation, and a core integration against your test environment. A full lifecycle dry-run (allowlist, mint, transfer, freeze, seize, redeem) with your ops team watching.
Priced on: institution size, core platform, and instrument choice. The Sprint produces your exact number.
Independent security audit, full remediation, multi-sig and timelock on every privileged role, live sanctions screening, and monitoring wired into your AML workflow. Controlled launch with a pilot customer group and capped limits.
Plus: the third-party security audit, billed as a disclosed pass-through at cost plus a 15% coordination fee. Typical range $60,000–$150,000 depending on scope and firm.
Runbooks for every scenario, 8–16 hours of training across treasury, compliance, IT, and ops, and a 90-day support window. After that, support moves to a retainer, or to your own team.
The test of success: your staff onboards a customer, processes a mint and a redemption, freezes an account, and clears a reconciliation exception without calling us.
A straightforward single-core, single-instrument path to a live system runs roughly $750,000 to $900,000 all-in, including the external audit. After that, you own it.
Turnkey issuers monetize your reserves, typically keeping around 10% of the yield the float generates. That's a fee that scales with your circulating supply, forever, and leaves you owning nothing. Building costs more on day one and stops costing more after that. Here's where the lines cross. Every assumption is editable; check our math.
Owning pays for itself above ≈ $69M in circulating supply.
Below that, renting is cheaper, and above it, the gap widens every year.
Estimates only, for planning discussion. Platform take rates vary by provider and tier; some publish a 90/10 reserve-yield split, others price differently. Build costs depend on your core platform, instrument choice, and institution size. Your Feasibility Sprint replaces these estimates with real numbers.
Not a license. Not an escrow arrangement. Your repo, your code, from the first commit.
Written for your team and your examiner, not for us.
100% coverage with invariant and fuzz testing, handed over with the code.
Full report, every finding, every remediation, dated and traceable.
Every operational scenario, including the ones nobody wants to run.
8–16 hours across treasury, compliance, IT, and ops. Live, with your actual system.
Reserve structure, licensing, and the opinion on whether your institution may issue at all belong to your counsel, your compliance team, and your regulators. We build the technical system that supports their work. Be wary of any vendor who prices this as a line item.
We never self-certify. The audit goes to a reputable third-party firm and we pass the cost through with a 15% coordination fee, shown on the invoice.
FIS, Fiserv, and Jack Henry may charge for API access, sandbox environments, or integration certification. Those go direct to them. We'll tell you what to expect during the Sprint.
Your custodian and your attestation firm bill you directly. We integrate with them.
The 90-day support window is included. What follows is optional, month to month, with 60 days' notice. You own the code either way. This is help, not access.
Business-hours advisory. Contract and dependency monitoring, quarterly patch review, reconciliation exception support, and a monthly operations review.
For institutions whose team has taken the system over and wants a backstop.
Everything in Steward, plus 24/7 on-call coverage for the reserve invariant and pause path, monthly attestation support, and incident response with a defined SLA.
For institutions running live customer volume.
Everything in Operator, plus a named engineer, roadmap and feature work, annual re-audit coordination, and examiner support hours when the exam arrives.
For institutions treating the system as a product line.
Credit unions and bank groups forming a shared settlement layer don't need N copies of the same build. We build the shared infrastructure once and onboard each institution onto it: governance, per-institution roles, and private channels included. The per-institution cost falls sharply after the first few.
Consortium engagements are priced on the shared build plus a per-institution onboarding fee. The structure depends on the governance model, so we scope these individually.
Talk to us about a consortium →Because you shouldn't have to sit through a discovery call to find out whether this is a $50,000 conversation or a $5,000,000 one. The Sprint price is exact. The build ranges are honest ranges, and your Sprint turns them into a fixed number.
Because the deliverable is real. You leave with a signed-off requirements document, a target architecture, and a costed roadmap that your board can act on, including the decision not to proceed. A free assessment is a sales document. This isn't one.
Institution size, core platform and how cooperative its APIs are, whether you're issuing a stablecoin or a tokenized deposit, the number of counterparty types in scope, and whether you need multi-entity governance from day one. The Sprint tells you exactly where you land and why.
No. Not basis points on float, not per-transaction fees, not revenue share. We'd be taking a permanent position in your money supply, which is precisely the arrangement we exist to replace. We charge fixed fees for engineering and an optional monthly retainer for support.
Yes. Build stages are billed against defined milestones with the first tranche at signing. We work with your procurement and AP terms.
You keep everything: source, tests, documentation, and the dry-run results. There is no clawback and no license to renew. That's what owning means.
A Feasibility Sprint gives your board a clear answer: the right instrument, a target architecture, a core-integration assessment, and a costed roadmap. Start there. Scale only when it's earned.